From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Balla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 9, 1996
227 A.D.2d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

May 9, 1996

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Claimant, a dump truck driver, purportedly left his job because his employer failed to make repairs to an unsafe truck. The Board denied his application for unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Upon reviewing the record, we find that the Board's decision is supported by substantial evidence. Although claimant stated that the truck he drove was in need of numerous repairs, the record indicates that he failed to note many of the alleged defects on the relevant driver's inspection report. The record further reveals that prior to leaving his job, claimant had earned just less than the amount that would trigger a reduction in his Social Security benefits. In view of this testimony, as well as his employer's testimony that claimant asked to be laid off, the Board could reasonably conclude that claimant quit his job to avoid a reduction in his Social Security benefits. Therefore, we find no reason to disturb the Board's decision.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Balla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 9, 1996
227 A.D.2d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Balla

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of KENNETH S. BALLA, Appellant. JOHN E…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 9, 1996

Citations

227 A.D.2d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
642 N.Y.S.2d 102

Citing Cases

Matter of the Claim of Polese

Notwithstanding claimant's testimony that he did not intend to resign but merely wanted to cease any further…

Matter of Rizzicone

Inasmuch as dissatisfaction with one's work environment does not constitute good cause for leaving employment…