Opinion
January 30, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce McM. Wright, J.).
The medical examination of petitioner demonstrated that she suffered from delusions and severe mood swings, along with a tendency toward violence. All of the medical experts who examined the petitioner noted that this condition could be caused by either mental illness or the ingestion of drugs, or a combination of both. Consequently, the drug testing to which petitioner was subjected was based on a reasonable suspicion (Matter of Shepard v. Ward, 155 A.D.2d 293).
Petitioner also contends that respondent's determination was irrational because the types of drug tests employed were not thoroughly explained at her disciplinary hearing. However, the Syva Emit-st drug detection system tests, known as EMIT tests, performed here were sufficiently accurate and reliable to provide a rational and substantial basis for the finding of guilt of the charges (Matter of Lahey v. Kelly, 71 N.Y.2d 135).
Finally, dismissal from the force was neither an excessive nor shocking penalty under the circumstances herein.
We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions and do not believe that they warrant disturbance of the administrative determination.
Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.