From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Aster Agency, Inc. v. Miller

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County
May 9, 1956
13 Misc. 2d 946 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1956)

Opinion

May 9, 1956

Brennan, Gibson Korshin ( George R. Brennan of counsel), for petitioner.

G. Burchard Smith, County Attorney ( George L. Greenstein of counsel), for respondents.


Application [for order under article 78 of Civil Practice] granted. The respondents had no legal basis for their disapproval of the plat or map involved herein. The mere fact that the State may extend a highway through a portion of the petitioner's property does not sustain the respondents' position. As Mr. Justice HOGAN wrote in a similar proceeding: "If the Long Island State Park Commission wishes to acquire this property, it should move promptly for an order condemning it, and thus minimize the damage to the petitioner. It cannot, by a mere statement of intent, which binds no one, compel an owner to maintain his property in an unproductive state for an indefinite period, in the manner here proposed." ( Matter of Lido Links Homes v. Young, 13 Misc.2d 157, 158.)

Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Matter of Aster Agency, Inc. v. Miller

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County
May 9, 1956
13 Misc. 2d 946 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1956)
Case details for

Matter of Aster Agency, Inc. v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ASTER AGENCY, INC., Petitioner, against ALLEN C. MILLER…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County

Date published: May 9, 1956

Citations

13 Misc. 2d 946 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1956)
181 N.Y.S.2d 13

Citing Cases

Matter of St. Morris Associates v. McMorran

The respondent agencies had refused to act upon petitioner's plan; and Special Term's dismissal of this…

Matter of Corrado v. Wolf

The formula for delaying building in the bed of a mapped street (General City Law, § 35; Village Law, §…