From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Antignano v. Gunn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1987
134 A.D.2d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

November 9, 1987


Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

We find that the Hearing Officer heard substantial evidence from which he could conclude that the petitioner had filed fraudulent claims (300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 181). Further, the penalty imposed is not excessive in light of the petitioner's supervisory position, his careful and thorough plan to defraud, and the respondents' need to deter similar false claims (see, Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 238-239).

We have considered the petitioner's remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Lawrence and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Antignano v. Gunn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1987
134 A.D.2d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Antignano v. Gunn

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DOMINIC ANTIGNANO, Petitioner, v. DAVID GUNN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 9, 1987

Citations

134 A.D.2d 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Roach v. Plainedge Union Free School District

The respondent's determination that the petitioner made false entries on her time sheets was supported by…

Clark v. Canandaigua City School District

Memorandum: There is substantial evidence to support respondent's determination that petitioner, the senior…