From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Angelo v. Triangle Broom and Brush Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

March, 1935.

Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.


The question is of coverage. The policy was issued to a copartnership. One of the partners retired and the remaining partner continued the business under the same name at the same place. Claimant was injured while employed by the business being conducted by the remaining partner. ( Matter of Lipschitz v. Hotel Charles, 252 N.Y. 518.) Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Angelo v. Triangle Broom and Brush Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Matter of Angelo v. Triangle Broom and Brush Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MIKE ANGELO, Respondent, against TRIANGLE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1935

Citations

243 App. Div. 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Park

Contrary to claimant's assertion, neither the stated name nor the structural composition of the insured is…

Matter of Fredenburgh v. Benjamin

The mere dropping out of an insured partner does not vitiate the policy. ( Matter of Goldstein v. Goldstein,…