From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Andreassen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 18, 1976
54 A.D.2d 1048 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

November 18, 1976


Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 21, 1976, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding claimant ineligible to receive benefits effective January 27, 1976 through March 2, 1976 because he was not available for employment in that period (Labor Law, § 591, subd 2). Claimant, a deckhand on vessels in the Great Lakes area, last worked on December 2, 1975 at which time he was laid off at the end of the Great Lakes shipping season. On January 27, 1976, claimant left by car for West Palm Beach, Florida, stopping briefly on the way at Savannah, Jacksonville, and Fort Lauderdale. He returned driving his car to New York on March 3, 1976. The board found that claimant went on a vacation trip to Florida during the period in question and that his meager efforts to find work in Florida did not constitute a meaningful search for employment during that vacation period. As there is substantial evidence in the record to support the board's findings, the decision must be affirmed (Matter of Longabucco [Levine], 50 A.D.2d 1002; Matter of Zaput [Catherwood], 25 A.D.2d 903). Decision affirmed, without costs. Kane, J.P., Main, Larkin, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Andreassen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 18, 1976
54 A.D.2d 1048 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Matter of Andreassen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of OTTO ANDREASSEN, Appellant. PHILIP ROSS, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 1048 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

In re Gray

Florida, failed to notify the Department at that time of his seasonal relocation and did not demonstrate that…

Gray v. Comm'r of Labor

Claimant certified that he was ready, willing and able to work every day during the relevant time periods;…