From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Amore v. Ninth Fed. Savings Loan Assn

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 21, 1963
195 N.E.2d 309 (N.Y. 1963)

Opinion

Argued October 30, 1963

Decided November 21, 1963

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Albert P. Thill for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Jorge L. Gomez, Paxton Blair and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

No appearance for claimant-respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen's Compensation Board; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, BURKE, FOSTER and SCILEPPI. Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that there is no substantial evidence that decedent's heart attack was caused by his employment.


Summaries of

Matter of Amore v. Ninth Fed. Savings Loan Assn

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 21, 1963
195 N.E.2d 309 (N.Y. 1963)
Case details for

Matter of Amore v. Ninth Fed. Savings Loan Assn

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MARIA DI AMORE, Respondent, v. NINTH FEDERAL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 21, 1963

Citations

195 N.E.2d 309 (N.Y. 1963)
195 N.E.2d 309
245 N.Y.S.2d 600