Opinion
March 18, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Stecher, J.).
Respondent's proof of mailing of the notice of cancellation was sufficient to show that the notice was sent to the insured's address as shown on the policy (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313 [a]). Petitioner's argument that the insurer of the offending vehicle did not comply with the cancellation requirements of the New York Automobile Insurance Plan was not asserted before the IAS Court, and thus cannot be asserted on appeal (Matter of Hartford Ins. Co. [Aquaviva], 179 A.D.2d 546).
Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Ross, Asch and Kassal, JJ.