From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of 6 E. 112th Street v. State Tax Commission

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 10, 1960
168 N.E.2d 839 (N.Y. 1960)

Opinion

Argued May 17, 1960

Decided June 10, 1960

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Emil Levin and Harry Merwin for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Robert W. Bush and Paxton Blair of counsel), for respondent.



Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, VAN VOORHIS and FOSTER. Judges FULD, FROESSEL and BURKE dissent and vote to reverse upon the ground that, by their renting of a few furnished apartments without accompanying services of any kind, petitioners did not thereby engage in any other business nor cease to be "wholly engaged" in the business of real estate and "in holding title to real estate for itself", within the meaning of section 182 of the Tax Law and, accordingly, the commission's reclassification of petitioners is arbitrary and unreasonable.


Summaries of

Matter of 6 E. 112th Street v. State Tax Commission

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 10, 1960
168 N.E.2d 839 (N.Y. 1960)
Case details for

Matter of 6 E. 112th Street v. State Tax Commission

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of 6 E. 112TH STREET CORP. et al., Appellants, against STATE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 10, 1960

Citations

168 N.E.2d 839 (N.Y. 1960)
168 N.E.2d 839
204 N.Y.S.2d 169

Citing Cases

Shoreham-Wading v. Town

The contention that it should now be abandoned merely because a default of great magnitude has occurred is…

Orda v. State Tax Commission

The individual petitioners own, as tenants in common and as copartners, a large apartment house in Brooklyn.…