From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matsui v. City of San Diego

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Dec 20, 2021
21cv1710-MMA(BLM) (S.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)

Opinion

21cv1710-MMA(BLM)

12-20-2021

JUSTIN MATSUI, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO AND DOES 1-20, inclusive, Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH MODIFICATION

[ECF NO. 6]

HON. BARBARA L. MAJOR, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

On December 17, 2021, the parties filed a joint motion requesting that the Court enter the parties' Protective Order. ECF No. 6. The Court has considered the Proposed Protective Order and, for good cause shown, the joint motion is GRANTED with the following modification:

Paragraph 15 [ECF No. 6 at 13] should read: “Continuing Jurisdiction: The Court shall retain jurisdiction for a period of one (1) year after the conclusion of this action to enforce the terms of the Protective Order.”

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Matsui v. City of San Diego

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Dec 20, 2021
21cv1710-MMA(BLM) (S.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Matsui v. City of San Diego

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN MATSUI, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO AND DOES 1-20, inclusive…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Dec 20, 2021

Citations

21cv1710-MMA(BLM) (S.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)