From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matrix Grp., LLC v. Innerlight Holdings, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION
Nov 7, 2012
Case No. 2:11-cv-00987 (D. Utah Nov. 7, 2012)

Summary

granting motion to strike parts of a 64-page complaint that was redundant

Summary of this case from Dionne v. ITP W. Express, Inc.

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-00987

11-07-2012

THE MATRIX GROUP, LLC Plaintiff, v. INNERLIGHT HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and INNERLIGHT WORLDWIDE, INC., a Delaware corporation Defendants.


RULING & ORDER


United States District Court Judge Robert

Shelby


Magistrate Judge Dustin Pead

The court provides this Ruling and Order by way of clarification of its prior Order as issued on November 5, 2012. (Document Number 134).

Plaintiff's Motion To Amend its Complaint is granted in its entirety. Consistent with the granting of defendants' Motion To Strike, the Court orders that the amended complaint remove any references to Mr. MacAniff that are redundant or immaterial to plaintiff's causes of action.

The deadline for defendants' to file their motion for summary judgment shall be ten days after the timely filing of defendants' answer to plaintiff's amended complaint.

___________

Dustin Pead

U.S. Federal Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Matrix Grp., LLC v. Innerlight Holdings, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION
Nov 7, 2012
Case No. 2:11-cv-00987 (D. Utah Nov. 7, 2012)

granting motion to strike parts of a 64-page complaint that was redundant

Summary of this case from Dionne v. ITP W. Express, Inc.
Case details for

Matrix Grp., LLC v. Innerlight Holdings, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:THE MATRIX GROUP, LLC Plaintiff, v. INNERLIGHT HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

Date published: Nov 7, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-00987 (D. Utah Nov. 7, 2012)

Citing Cases

Kombea Corp. v. Noguar, L.C.

In general, courts disfavor granting motions for protective orders "when the result is a delay in discovery…

Dionne v. ITP W. Express, Inc.

Although defendants do not cite any case authority, the Tenth Circuit has dismissed or struck complaints…