From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matlock v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi
Apr 23, 1987
729 S.W.2d 960 (Tex. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 13-87-009-CV.

April 23, 1987.

Appeal from 148th District Court, Nueces County, Margarito C. Garza, J.

Peter Steiner, Markey, Hughes Steiner, Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Roberta J. Hegland, Kleberg, Dyer, Redford Weil, Corpus Christi, for appellee.

OPINION


Appellant timely filed an affidavit of inability to pay costs in lieu of a cost bond. Appellant gave notice of the filing of the affidavit to appellee's attorney but failed to give notice to the court reporter as required by Tex.R.App.P. 40(a)(3)(B). See Matlock v. The Honorable Margarito Garza, District Judge, 725 S.W.2d 527 (Tex.App. — Corpus Christi, 1987, no writ). Because appellant failed to give notice to the court reporter, she is not entitled to prosecute the appeal without paying the costs or giving security therefor. Tex.R.App.P. 40(a)(3)(B). Appellant has failed to post any security for costs.

Having considered the documents on file, and appellant's failure to perfect the appeal, this Court is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.


Summaries of

Matlock v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi
Apr 23, 1987
729 S.W.2d 960 (Tex. App. 1987)
Case details for

Matlock v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Linda MATLOCK, Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi

Date published: Apr 23, 1987

Citations

729 S.W.2d 960 (Tex. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

VILLARREAL v. H.E. BUTT GROC

Because of appellant's failure to comply with the notice provision of this rule, she is not now entitled to…

Dodson v. Stevens Transport

It has been held that an appellant is not entitled to prosecute an appeal without paying or securing the…