From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matlak v. Damon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Aug 20, 2013
(S.D. Ill. Aug. 20, 2013)

Opinion

08-20-2013

BOGUSLAW SLAWOMIR MATLAK, Plaintiff, v. ACUFF DAMON, C/O FLEMING and C/O BROWN, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Doc. 26) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending this Court dismiss this case with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new hearing and may consider the record before the magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence deemed necessary. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).

The Court has received no objection to the R & R. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R & R (Doc. 26), DISMISSES this case with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

J. PHIL GILBERT

DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Matlak v. Damon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Aug 20, 2013
(S.D. Ill. Aug. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Matlak v. Damon

Case Details

Full title:BOGUSLAW SLAWOMIR MATLAK, Plaintiff, v. ACUFF DAMON, C/O FLEMING and C/O…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Date published: Aug 20, 2013

Citations

(S.D. Ill. Aug. 20, 2013)