From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mathis-Manuel v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
Mar 23, 2020
No. SA-20-CV-00322-OLG (W.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2020)

Opinion

SA-20-CV-00322-OLG

03-23-2020

CATHY MATHIS-MANUEL, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Defendant.


ORDER

Before the court in the above-styled cause of action is Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [#1]. This case was automatically referred to the undersigned upon filing, and the undersigned has authority to enter this order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") based on an inability to afford court fees and costs. Having considered Plaintiff's application and supporting affidavit, the Court is of the opinion the motion should be granted.

All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for a writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $350, as well as an administrative fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Plaintiff's motion to proceed IFP includes income and asset information, which indicates that Plaintiff is unemployed, lives with her mother, has one dependent, lacks assets or savings, and receives a monthly pension in the amount of $1,535. This information demonstrates that Plaintiff does not have sufficient monthly resources available to pay the filing fee, and the Court will grant the motion to proceed IFP.

The administrative fee, which is currently $50, is waived for plaintiffs who are granted IFP status. See District Court Miscellaneous Fee Schedule, available at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/fees/district-court-miscellaneous-fee-schedule.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis [#1] is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint [#1-1] shall be filed by the Clerk without prepayment of fees, costs or the giving of security, and the Clerk shall, until further Order of this Court, waive the collection of any other fees or costs from Plaintiff.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve each Defendant required to be served with a copy of the summons, complaint, and a copy of this Order by certified mail, return receipt requested, if possible. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1) (permitting service pursuant to state law); Tex. R. Civ. P. 106(a)(2) (permitting service by certified or registered mail by a person authorized to serve by Rule 103); Tex. R. Civ. P. 103 (permitting service by certified or registered mail by sheriff, constable, clerk, or any person authorized by law).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 23rd day of March, 2020.

/s/_________

ELIZABETH S. ("BETSY") CHESTNEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Mathis-Manuel v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
Mar 23, 2020
No. SA-20-CV-00322-OLG (W.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2020)
Case details for

Mathis-Manuel v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:CATHY MATHIS-MANUEL, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 23, 2020

Citations

No. SA-20-CV-00322-OLG (W.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2020)