From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mathiowetz v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. North Dakota
Dec 11, 2003
Case No. A2-03-105 (D.N.D. Dec. 11, 2003)

Opinion

Case No. A2-03-105

December 11, 2003


Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice


Before the Court is a motion by the United States to dismiss, without prejudice, for improper venue (doc. #3). Plaintiffs filed a brief in opposition (doc. # 5).

This action is a tax refund suit brought under § 7422 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.) and 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1). Under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1), the district courts, concurrent with the United States Court of Federal Claims, shall have original jurisdiction of "[a]ny civil action against the United States for the recovery of any internal-revenue tax alleged to have been erroneously or illegally assessed or collected. . . ." Venue for an action by an individual taxpayer brought against the United States under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a) is proper in the judicial district where the plaintiff resides. 28 U.S.C. § 1402(a)(1).

It is undisputed that the Plaintiffs reside in Morton, Minnesota. Thus, the Court finds venue is improper in this Court. Accordingly, the United States' motion to dismiss is GRANTED and it is ordered that this action be dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiffs' right to re-file in a court in which venue is proper.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mathiowetz v. U.S.

United States District Court, D. North Dakota
Dec 11, 2003
Case No. A2-03-105 (D.N.D. Dec. 11, 2003)
Case details for

Mathiowetz v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:James J. Mathiowetz and Lorraine Mathiowetz, Plaintiffs, v. United States…

Court:United States District Court, D. North Dakota

Date published: Dec 11, 2003

Citations

Case No. A2-03-105 (D.N.D. Dec. 11, 2003)