From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mathiarasan v. Veeraswamy

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION
Mar 6, 2013
DOCKET NO. A-0529-11T3 (App. Div. Mar. 6, 2013)

Opinion

DOCKET NO. A-0529-11T3

03-06-2013

VELUSWAMY MATHIARASAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. POORNIMA VEERASWAMY, Defendant-Respondent.

Veluswamy Mathiarasan, appellant pro se. Poornima Veeraswamy, respondent pro se.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

Before Judges Koblitz and Accurso.

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Middlesex County, Docket No. FM-12-885-05C.

Veluswamy Mathiarasan, appellant pro se.

Poornima Veeraswamy, respondent pro se. PER CURIAM

This matter is before the court following our remand for the trial court to hear oral argument on the parties' cross-motions and determine, with a statement of reasons, whether imputation of income to either party was appropriate and whether recalculation of child support was warranted. Following a remand hearing, the trial judge issued an order on October 4,


Summaries of

Mathiarasan v. Veeraswamy

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION
Mar 6, 2013
DOCKET NO. A-0529-11T3 (App. Div. Mar. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Mathiarasan v. Veeraswamy

Case Details

Full title:VELUSWAMY MATHIARASAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. POORNIMA VEERASWAMY…

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 6, 2013

Citations

DOCKET NO. A-0529-11T3 (App. Div. Mar. 6, 2013)