From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mathews v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 18, 1991
596 So. 2d 79 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 91-02484.

September 18, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Richard A. Lazzara, J.


Pursuant to our recent opinion in Judge v. State, 596 So.2d 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), we reverse the summary denial of appellant's motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Upon remand, unless the case files and records conclusively show that appellant is not entitled to relief, the trial court shall order the state to file an answer. After receipt of the answer, the trial court shall determine whether an evidentiary hearing is required. If the trial court should summarily deny the motion again, it shall attach such portions of the record which conclusively refute appellant's allegations. Any party aggrieved by the subsequent action of the trial court must file a notice of appeal within thirty days to obtain appellate review.

RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK and PARKER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mathews v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 18, 1991
596 So. 2d 79 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Mathews v. State

Case Details

Full title:DWIGHT MATHEWS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Sep 18, 1991

Citations

596 So. 2d 79 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. State

Generally, a rule 3.800(a) motion for award of jail-time credit is deemed facially sufficient when the…

Small v. State

Because the trial court did not attach the proper documents, the summary denial is reversed. See Ransom v.…