From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matheus v. Citibank N.A.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jun 27, 2013
NO. 02-13-00162-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 27, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 02-13-00162-CV

06-27-2013

RUTH MATHEUS APPELLANT v. CITIBANK N.A. APPELLEE


FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered appellant's "Motion to Dismiss Appeal." It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Matheus v. Citibank N.A.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jun 27, 2013
NO. 02-13-00162-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Matheus v. Citibank N.A.

Case Details

Full title:RUTH MATHEUS APPELLANT v. CITIBANK N.A. APPELLEE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Jun 27, 2013

Citations

NO. 02-13-00162-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 27, 2013)