Matelyan v. Starbucks Coffee Co.

Full title: ARIKA MATELYAN Plaintiffs, v. STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jan 21, 2015

2:14-cv-08619-MMM-AS (C.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2015)

Opinion

ARIKA MATELYAN Plaintiffs, v. STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY Defendants. No. 2:14-cv-08619-MMM-AS United States District Court, Central District of California January 21, 2015

          ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE (PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41)

          Margaret M. Morrow United States District Judge

         On December 17. 2014. the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.

         A written response to the Order to Show Cause was ordered to be filed no later than December 29. 2014.

         No response having been filed to the Court's Order to Show Cause,

         IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-entitled case is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 41.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.