From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MASSIE DRILLING CO. v. NEES

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Amarillo
Oct 3, 1923
254 S.W. 629 (Tex. Civ. App. 1923)

Opinion

No. 2164.

June 20, 1923. Rehearing Denied October 3, 1923.

Error from District Court, Wichita County; P. A. Martin, Judge.

Action by G. L. Nees against the Massie Drilling Company and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and named defendant brings error. Judgment affirmed.

Bonner, Bonner Sanford, of Wichita Falls, and Slay, Simon, Smith Morris, of Fort Worth, for plaintiff in error.

T. B. Greenwood and W. B. Chauncey, both of Wichita Falls, for defendant in error.



In Connellee v. Nees, 254 S.W. 625, this day decided, the appellee in that case sued and obtained judgment against the Massie Drilling Company, T. W. Connellee, P. G. Pangburn, T. O. Massie, and estate of Joe M. Collins. The appellee alleged that the Massie Drilling Company was a joint-stock association, as well as a partnership, and that the individuals named composed the partnership. From the judgment rendered the Massie Drilling Company, as a separate entity, has sued out writ of error to this court, asserting that the service was not sufficient to warrant default judgment against the Massie Drilling Company, which we held to be a partnership. Personal service was obtained on all the members. This was sufficient to bring the partnership before the court and authorize judgment against it, as well as the individual members served. Graham Hotel Corp. v. Leader (Tex.Civ.App.) 241 S.W. 700.

The assignments are overruled, and the judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

MASSIE DRILLING CO. v. NEES

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Amarillo
Oct 3, 1923
254 S.W. 629 (Tex. Civ. App. 1923)
Case details for

MASSIE DRILLING CO. v. NEES

Case Details

Full title:MASSIE DRILLING CO. v. NEES

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Amarillo

Date published: Oct 3, 1923

Citations

254 S.W. 629 (Tex. Civ. App. 1923)

Citing Cases

Shambeck v. Johnson

"The statutory proceedings noted, and to which the law exacts a close adherence, are all steps necessary to…

Lakin v. C.R.I. Pac. Ry. Co.

The issue in Bruns v. United Rys. Co., 251 S.W. 760, cited in the plaintiff's motion, involves issue of fact…