Opinion
CV 05-921 PK.
September 1, 2006
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Papak filed his Findings and Recommendation in this case on July 19, 2006 (#56). The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate's report.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). Petitioner filed timely objections. Therefore, I have given the file of this case a de novo review.
I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Findings and Recommendation (#56) of Magistrate Judge Papak, GRANTING Respondent/Garnishee, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA's Motion for Summary Judgment (#34) and GRANTING Petitioners' Motion to Strike (#50).
IT IS SO ORDERED.