From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Massey v. Desoto County, Mississippi

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Delta Division
Sep 2, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08CV243-P-S (N.D. Miss. Sep. 2, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08CV243-P-S.

September 2, 2009


ORDER


This cause is before the Court sua sponte for consideration of dismissal with respect to plaintiff Essie Talley's state law claim against defendant Chad Gammons. The Court, having reviewed the record and the applicable law, finds as follows, to-wit:

That the instant claim cannot be said to be "so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution." 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). Accordingly, the Court lacks supplemental jurisdiction to adjudicate Talley's claim. Accordingly, Talley's claim will be dismissed without prejudice to her right to seek relief in an appropriate forum.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff Essie Talley's state law property damage claim should be, and hereby is, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Essie Talley should be, and hereby is, DISMISSED as a party plaintiff. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Chad Gammons should be, and hereby is, DISMISSED as a party defendant.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Massey v. Desoto County, Mississippi

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Delta Division
Sep 2, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08CV243-P-S (N.D. Miss. Sep. 2, 2009)
Case details for

Massey v. Desoto County, Mississippi

Case Details

Full title:TONIA MASSEY, GREG MASSEY AND ESSIE TALLEY PLAINTIFFS v. DESOTO COUNTY…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Delta Division

Date published: Sep 2, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08CV243-P-S (N.D. Miss. Sep. 2, 2009)