Massengill v. State

Full title: TERRY LAMAR MASSENGILL, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: May 13, 2011

SACV 11-0538-AHM (RNB) (C.D. Cal. May. 13, 2011)

Opinion

TERRY LAMAR MASSENGILL, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. No. SACV 11-0538-AHM (RNB) United States District Court, C.D. California. May 13, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          A. HOWARD MATZ, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered summarily dismissing this action with prejudice.