Maslow v. Dep't of Revenue ex rel. Edwards

Full title: EDWARD W. MASLOW, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE O/B/O JULIANNE M…

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jul 20, 2012

Case No. 5D11-3034 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jul. 20, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 5D11-3034

07-20-2012

EDWARD W. MASLOW, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE O/B/O JULIANNE M. EDWARDS, Appellee.

Edward W. Maslow, Little Falls, New York, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and William H. Branch, Assistant Attorney General, Child Support Enforcement Division, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Lisa Davidson, Judge. Edward W. Maslow, Little Falls, New York, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and William H. Branch, Assistant Attorney General, Child Support Enforcement Division, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM.

Edward Maslow appeals the trial court's order recalculating his child support obligation and arrearages. In doing so, he misperceives the effect of our remand in Maslow v. Edwards, 59 So. 3d 299 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). There, we concluded that the trial court had failed to apply the correct formula in determining Maslow's child support obligation, but affirmed as to all other issues raised by Maslow. On remand, the trial court complied with our mandate in recalculating child support. Contrary to Maslow's argument, he was not entitled to a new trial.

AFFIRMED. ORFINGER, C.J., TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.