From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maslic v. Ism Vuzem D.O.O.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 10, 2024
21-cv-02556-BLF (N.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2024)

Opinion

21-cv-02556-BLF

01-10-2024

SASA MASLIC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ISM VUZEM D.O.O., et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING ATTORNEY ALEXANDER JUSTIN HOLTZMAN TO FILE A STATUS REPORT BY JANUARY 24, 2024 RE HIS REPRESENTATION OF DEFENDANT EISENMANN CORPORATION

BETH LABSON FREEMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

On December 4, 2023, the Court issued an order permitting the law firms Frost Brown Todd LLC and Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to withdraw as counsel of record for Defendant Eisenmann Corporation (“Eisenmann”). See Order, ECF 103.

In reviewing the docket, the Court observes that attorney Alexander Justin Holtzman of the San Francisco City Attorney's Office still appears listed as counsel of record for Eisenmann. Mr. Holtzman previously was employed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, and it may be that he left that firm and joined the San Francisco City Attorney's Office without filing a Notice of Change in Counsel as required under the district's Civil Local Rules. See Civ. L.R. 5-1(c)(2)(C) (“If a particular counsel ceases to be involved with a case when the party is still represented by other counsel, a Notice of Change in Counsel must be e-filed.”).

Mr. Holtzman SHALL file a status report regarding his representation of Defendant Eisenmann Corporation on or before January 24, 2024.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Maslic v. Ism Vuzem D.O.O.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 10, 2024
21-cv-02556-BLF (N.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2024)
Case details for

Maslic v. Ism Vuzem D.O.O.

Case Details

Full title:SASA MASLIC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ISM VUZEM D.O.O., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 10, 2024

Citations

21-cv-02556-BLF (N.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2024)