From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe v. Bernhardt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
May 28, 2020
Civil Action No. 18-2242 (PLF) (D.D.C. May. 28, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 18-2242 (PLF)

05-28-2020

MASHPEE WAMPANOAG TRIBE, Plaintiff, v. DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, et al., Defendants, and DAVID LITTLEFIELD, et al., Defendant-Intervenors.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the motion [Dkt. No. 65] of members of Congress for leave to file a brief as amici curiae in support of the plaintiff. The plaintiff consents to this motion, and neither the federal defendants nor the defendant-intervenors have stated a position at this time.

This Court has "broad discretion" in determining whether to permit a party to participate in a lawsuit as amicus curiae. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands v. United States, Civil Action No. 08-1572, 2009 WL 596986, at *1 (D.D.C. Mar. 6, 2009) (citing Nat'l Ass'n of Home Builders v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 519 F.Supp.2d 89, 93 (D.D.C. 2007)); see also United States v. Microsoft Corp., Civil Action No. 98-1232 2002 WL 319366, at *2 (D.D.C. Feb. 28, 2002). The filing of an amicus brief should be permitted if it will assist the judge "by presenting ideas, arguments, theories, insights, facts or data that are not to be found in the parties' briefs." Voices for Choices v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co., 339 F.3d 542, 545 (7th Cir. 2003). See also Ryan v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 125 F.3d 1062, 1063 (7th Cir. 1997) ("An amicus brief should normally be allowed when . . . the amicus has unique information or perspective that can help the court beyond the help that the lawyers for the parties are able to provide.").

Upon careful consideration, the Court concludes that the members of Congress's proposed brief will assist the Court in this matter because it includes unique arguments not found in the parties' briefs, and thus, the Court may benefit from its input. The Court will therefore permit the members of Congress to participate in this matter as amici curiae by filing their proposed amicus brief. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the members of Congress's motion [Dkt. No. 65] for leave to file a brief as amici curiae in support of the plaintiff is GRANTED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file the members of Congress's amicus brief [Dkt. No. 65-1] on the docket.

SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

United States District Judge DATE: May 28, 2020


Summaries of

Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe v. Bernhardt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
May 28, 2020
Civil Action No. 18-2242 (PLF) (D.D.C. May. 28, 2020)
Case details for

Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe v. Bernhardt

Case Details

Full title:MASHPEE WAMPANOAG TRIBE, Plaintiff, v. DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: May 28, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 18-2242 (PLF) (D.D.C. May. 28, 2020)