From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maselter v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Sep 29, 2008
Civil No. 07-2921 (RHK/JSM) (D. Minn. Sep. 29, 2008)

Summary

stating that the Polaski factors are the same as those found in SSR 96-7p

Summary of this case from Franks v. Colvin

Opinion

Civil No. 07-2921 (RHK/JSM).

September 29, 2008


ORDER


Before the Court are Plaintiff's Objections to the August 19, 2008 Amended Report and Recommendation, ("R R") of Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron. Having conducted a de novo review of the R R, and the Objections thereto, the undersigned is satisfied that Judge Mayeron's recommended disposition is fully supported by the factual record in this matter and controlling legal authorities. Accordingly, and upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. No. 17) are OVERRULED;

2. The Amended Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 15) is ADOPTED;

3. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 9) is DENIED;

4. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 11) is GRANTED; and

5. The Complaint (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Maselter v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Sep 29, 2008
Civil No. 07-2921 (RHK/JSM) (D. Minn. Sep. 29, 2008)

stating that the Polaski factors are the same as those found in SSR 96-7p

Summary of this case from Franks v. Colvin
Case details for

Maselter v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Laura L. Maselter, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of the…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Sep 29, 2008

Citations

Civil No. 07-2921 (RHK/JSM) (D. Minn. Sep. 29, 2008)

Citing Cases

Franks v. Colvin

The factors set out in SSR 96-7p are virtually the same as those set out in Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d…