From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marty v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 13, 2004
865 So. 2d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 2D03-3560.

Opinion filed February 13, 2004.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, Daniel Lee Perry, Judge.


David Marty appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse and remand

Marty pleaded guilty to aggravated assault, attempted manslaughter, shooting at, within, or into a building, and minor in possession of a firearm. He was subsequently sentenced to a three-year minimum mandatory prison term for the aggravated assault count and received five years probation, to run concurrently, on the counts of attempted manslaughter and shooting at, within, or into a building. He received county jail with time served on the minor in possession of a firearm charge. On May 29, 2002, Marty admitted to a violation of the terms of his probation for the counts of attempted manslaughter and shooting at, within, or into a building. The trial court then sentenced him to 81.35 months in prison, which was the minimum sentence within the calculations of the sentencing guidelines scoresheet.

Marty claims his scoresheet was improperly calculated because it incorrectly listed his May 29, 1998, conviction for aggravated assault as an additional offense. This resulted in an additional eighteen points being improperly added to his scoresheet. The trial court admits this error and asserts that because the corrected scoresheet would result in a range between 67.95 and 113.25 months, the sentence of 81.35 months imposed on Marty is legal because it is still within the sentencing guidelines. There is nothing in the record to conclusively demonstrate that Marty would have received 81.35 months under the corrected sentencing guidelines. Therefore, Marty is entitled to be resentenced using an accurate scoresheet. See Walker v. State, 807 So.2d 177 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to resentence Marty under the corrected scoresheet.

Reversed and remanded.

SALCINES and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED.


Summaries of

Marty v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 13, 2004
865 So. 2d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Marty v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID MARTY, Appellant v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Feb 13, 2004

Citations

865 So. 2d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. State

There is noting in the record to conclusively demonstrate that Wilson would have received a sentence of…