From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martorano v. McNair

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 31, 1994
208 A.D.2d 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

October 31, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the County's contentions, the prior written notice requirement of Suffolk County Charter § C8-2 (A) is inapplicable under the circumstances presented. It has been consistently held that the prior written notice laws should be strictly construed and refer to physical conditions in the streets or sidewalk, such as cracks and holes, which do not immediately come to the attention of municipal officers, unless they are given actual notice thereof (see, Hughes v. Jahoda, 75 N.Y.2d 881, 883; Alexander v. Elred, 63 N.Y.2d 460, 467; Doremus v. Incorporated Vil. of Lynbrook, 18 N.Y.2d 362; Torres v. Galvin, 189 A.D.2d 870; Flynn v. Town of N. Hempstead, 97 A.D.2d 430). Since the plaintiffs' claims do not fall within this category, Suffolk County Charter § C8-2 (A) does not apply. Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Sullivan and Miller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Martorano v. McNair

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 31, 1994
208 A.D.2d 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Martorano v. McNair

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH MARTORANO, as Administrator of ROSEMARY M. MARTORANO, Deceased, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 31, 1994

Citations

208 A.D.2d 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 568

Citing Cases

Balsan v. County of Suffolk

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the prior written…