From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martins v. Wood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 15, 1998
251 A.D.2d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 15, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Franco, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In 1992, David Wood, a defendant in the instant action, commenced an action in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, against the plaintiffs in the instant action. That prior action was based upon the same transaction and alleged the same facts as the instant action. A judgment in the prior action was entered upon the default of the plaintiffs herein ( see, CPLR 3215 [a]). Since a default judgment is a judgment on the merits ( see, Feeney v. Licari, 131 A.D.2d 539), the instant action must be dismissed upon the ground of res judicata ( see, CPLR 3211 [a] [5]). We additionally note that the claims raised in the instant action are identical to the defenses which were raised in the prior action by the plaintiffs herein in an attempt to establish entitlement to vacatur of the default judgment in the prior action, and that these defenses were previously found to be without merit by the Supreme Court in an order which was affirmed by this Court ( see, Wood v. Martins, 232 A.D.2d 407).

Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Martins v. Wood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 15, 1998
251 A.D.2d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Martins v. Wood

Case Details

Full title:JOSE MARTINS et al., Appellants, v. DAVID WOOD, Respondent, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 15, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
675 N.Y.S.2d 544

Citing Cases

Rely-On-Us, Inc. v. Torres

The plaintiff appeals. Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, although a dismissal for lack of capacity to…

Longobardi v. Pennacchio

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs. This action is barred by the default judgment…