From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martino v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 3, 2022
No. 17336-21 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 3, 2022)

Opinion

17336-21

01-03-2022

Joseph Anthony Martino, Jr Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER

Maurice B. Foley, Chief Judge

On December 2, 2021, petitioner filed a Motion To Restrain Assessment or Collection or To Order Refund of Amount of Collected. On December 29, 2021, respondent filed a Response to petitioner's motion to restrain. Among other things, in his Response respondent states that respondent's counsel has requested the IRS to: (1) abate the improper premature assessments made against petitioner for tax years 2017 and 2018, and (2) input a litigation hold on petitioner's account for 2018. Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that, on or before January 28, 2022, respondent shall file a First Supplement to his Response setting forth and discussing fully: (1) whether the IRS has now abated the improper premature assessments made against petitioner for tax years 2017 and 2018, and (2) whether the IRS has now inputted a litigation hold on petitioner's account for 2018.


Summaries of

Martino v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 3, 2022
No. 17336-21 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Martino v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Joseph Anthony Martino, Jr Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jan 3, 2022

Citations

No. 17336-21 (U.S.T.C. Jan. 3, 2022)