From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Wilson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 1, 1966
357 F.2d 173 (9th Cir. 1966)

Opinion

No. 20497.

March 1, 1966. Rehearing Denied April 1, 1966.

David Martinez, Jr., Tamal, Cal., in pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, Robert R. Granucci, John F. Kraetzer, Deputy Attys. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before POPE, HAMLEY and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.


The questions presented by appellant in this habeas corpus proceeding present no federal question, or are foreclosed by the plea of guilty, or were not raised in the district court, or are plainly without merit. Some of these questions are subject to two or more of these defects.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Wilson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 1, 1966
357 F.2d 173 (9th Cir. 1966)
Case details for

Martinez v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:David MARTINEZ, Jr., Appellant, v. Lawrence E. WILSON, Warden of San…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 1, 1966

Citations

357 F.2d 173 (9th Cir. 1966)

Citing Cases

Rawlins v. Craven

28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3). In re Burrus, 136 U.S. 586, 10 S.Ct. 850, 34 L.Ed. 500 (1890); Martinez v. Wilson,…

Perez v. Craven

Petitioner is not entitled to any relief since he does not demonstrate that he is "in custody in violation of…