From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Stanley Mosk Court House

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 30, 2024
2:24-cv-00275-CJC-AJR (C.D. Cal. May. 30, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-00275-CJC-AJR

05-30-2024

Jessica Martinez v. Stanley Mosk Court House


PRESENT: HONORABLE A. JOEL RICHLIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)

On January 11, 2024, pro se Plaintiff Jessica Martinez (“Plaintiff”), filed a complaint (the “Complaint”) against “Stanley Mosk Court House.” (Dkt. 1.) On January 30, 2024, the Court screened the Complaint and issued an order dismissing the Complaint with leave to amend (“Order”). (Dkt. 5.) In the Order, Plaintiff was directed to file a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) that attempts to remedy the identified defects by February 29, 2024. (Id.) On April 5, 2024, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why the action should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to file an amended complaint or request an extension of time in which to do so. (Dkt. 7.) Plaintiff was ordered to file a FAC, if any, by April 19, 2024. (Id.)

On April 15, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Change of Address. (Dkt. 8.) Plaintiff stated that she had been evicted from the previous mailing address and any mail sent to that address had been returned to sender. (Id.) The Court found good cause shown, discharged the Order to Show Cause, and ordered Plaintiff to file a FAC, if any, by May 16, 2024. (Dkt. 9).

More than a week has passed since Plaintiff's deadline to file a FAC in response to the Court's Order. As of today, Plaintiff has neither filed an amended complaint nor requested an extension of time in which to do so. The action cannot move forward unless and until Plaintiff files an amended complaint. Plaintiff is ordered to file a FAC, if any, by June 12, 2024 or show cause why the action should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. If Plaintiff chooses to file a FAC, it should attempt to remedy the pleading defects identified in the January 30, 2024 dismissal order (Dkt. 5.), bear the docket number assigned to this case (2:24-cv-00275-CJC-AJR), be labeled “First Amended Complaint,” and be complete in and of itself without reference to the original Complaint or any other document (except any document that Plaintiff chooses to attach to the FAC as an exhibit). Plaintiff is encouraged to state her claims in simple language and provide only a brief statement of supporting facts, omitting facts that are not relevant. Should Plaintiff decide to file a FAC, she is strongly encouraged to utilize the form complaint attached to this Order.

Plaintiff is expressly advised that if she does not file a FAC by the Court's deadline or respond to this order, the Court will recommend that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and obey Court orders. If Plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue this action or certain claims or defendants, she may voluntarily dismiss the entire action, certain claims, or certain defendants by filing a Notice of Dismissal in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). A form Notice of Dismissal is attached for Plaintiff's convenience.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Stanley Mosk Court House

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 30, 2024
2:24-cv-00275-CJC-AJR (C.D. Cal. May. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Martinez v. Stanley Mosk Court House

Case Details

Full title:Jessica Martinez v. Stanley Mosk Court House

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: May 30, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-00275-CJC-AJR (C.D. Cal. May. 30, 2024)