From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Peters

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 8, 2015
6:13-CV-00384-PK (D. Or. Apr. 8, 2015)

Opinion

6:13-CV-00384-PK

04-08-2015

LEONEL O. MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. COLETTE S. PETERS, Director, O.D.O.C.; JEFF PREMO, Superintendent, O.S.P.; M. YODER, Asst. Superintendent of Security O.S.P.; S.T.M. LT. YANCEY; S.T.M. LT. UFFORD; and STEVE FRANKE, Superintendent of T.R.C.I., Defendants.


ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (#131) on March 3, 2015, in which he recommends this Court deny Plaintiff's Motion (#55) for Summary Judgment, grant Defendants' Motion (#72) for Summary Judgment, grant Defendants' Motion (#91) to Dismiss, dismiss with prejudice Plaintiff's § 1983 claim set forth in his original Complaint (#2), and dismiss without prejudice Plaintiff's § 1983 claim set forth in his Supplemental Complaint (#82). The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation (#131). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion (#55) for Summary Judgment, GRANTS Defendants' Motion (#72) for Summary Judgment, GRANTS Defendants' Motion (#91) to Dismiss, DISMISSES with prejudice Plaintiff's § 1983 claim set forth in his original Complaint (#2), and DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's § 1983 claim set forth in his Supplemental Complaint (#82).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 8th day of April, 2015.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Martinez v. Peters

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 8, 2015
6:13-CV-00384-PK (D. Or. Apr. 8, 2015)
Case details for

Martinez v. Peters

Case Details

Full title:LEONEL O. MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. COLETTE S. PETERS, Director, O.D.O.C.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Apr 8, 2015

Citations

6:13-CV-00384-PK (D. Or. Apr. 8, 2015)

Citing Cases

Matthews v. Carey

"The exhaustion requirement found in the [PLRA also] applies to disciplinary proceedings." Voth v. Laney, No.…