From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Parker

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Aug 23, 2019
NO. 03-18-00730-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 23, 2019)

Opinion

NO. 03-18-00730-CV

08-23-2019

Maria Guadalupe Martinez, Appellant v. Benjamin Edward Parker, Appellee


FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY
NO. C-1-CV-16-003407, THE HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

In a June 28, 2018 order, the trial court dismissed for want of prosecution Maria Guadalupe Martinez's personal-injury lawsuit against Benjamin Edward Parker. Martinez timely filed a verified motion to reinstate her cause on July 26, 2018, which extended the deadline for filing a notice of appeal to ninety days after the trial court signed its dismissal order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(3). Martinez's motion to reinstate was overruled by operation of law when the trial court did not rule on it within seventy-five days of the date it signed the dismissal order. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 165a(3).

Martinez filed a notice of appeal challenging the trial court's denial of her motion to reinstate on November 11, 2018—more than ninety days after the trial court signed its dismissal order, which makes her notice of appeal untimely. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(3); McCoy v. North Forest Indep. Sch. Dist., No. 14-07-00523-CV, 2007 WL 5209540, at *2 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Nov. 15, 2007, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op.) (dismissing untimely appeal because order denying motion to reinstate is not separately appealable order from which appellate timeline is calculated); Weik v. Second Baptist Church of Hous., 988 S.W.2d 437, 438 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. denied) (holding that deadline for perfecting appeal runs from date of dismissal order, not from date of trial court's ruling on motion to reinstate). We sent Martinez notice that her appeal would be dismissed if she did not provide us within ten days proof of timely mailing of her notice of appeal. More than ten days have elapsed, and we have received no response from Martinez.

Because Martinez did not timely file her notice of appeal, we do not have jurisdiction and must dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

/s/_________

Thomas J. Baker, Justice Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: August 23, 2019


Summaries of

Martinez v. Parker

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Aug 23, 2019
NO. 03-18-00730-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 23, 2019)
Case details for

Martinez v. Parker

Case Details

Full title:Maria Guadalupe Martinez, Appellant v. Benjamin Edward Parker, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Aug 23, 2019

Citations

NO. 03-18-00730-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 23, 2019)