From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Palmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 25, 2013
CASE NUMBER: 3:10-CV-00777-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Feb. 25, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NUMBER: 3:10-CV-00777-LRH-VPC

02-25-2013

FREDYS MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. JACK PALMER, et al., Respondents.


JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

_ Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. _ Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. X Decision by Court. This action came to be considered before the Court. The issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that respondents' motion to dismiss (#36) is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice as untimely.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is GRANTED on the issue of whether the court is correct in its determination that equitable tolling is not warranted.

LANCE S. WILSON

Clerk

D. R. Morgan

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Martinez v. Palmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 25, 2013
CASE NUMBER: 3:10-CV-00777-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Feb. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Martinez v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:FREDYS MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. JACK PALMER, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 25, 2013

Citations

CASE NUMBER: 3:10-CV-00777-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Feb. 25, 2013)