From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Ortiz

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 18, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-cv-00138-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 18, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-cv-00138-WYD-BNB.

October 18, 2006


ORDER


This matter is before me on the following motions:

(1) Motion for Appointment of Advisory Counsel [Doc. # 76, filed 8/28/2006] (the "Motion to Appoint Counsel"); and

(2) Motion Requesting Blank Subpoena Forms for Witnesses [Doc. # 77, filed 8/28/2006] (the "Motion for Subpoenas").

The plaintiff's claims against the defendants in their official capacities for prospective injunctive relief have withstood the defendants' motion for summary judgment, see Order Affirming and Adopting United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. # 75, filed 7/31/2006], and have been set for a three day trial to the court beginning June 4, 2007. Minute Order [Doc. # 79, filed 9/5/2006].

I held a hearing on the motions this morning and made rulings on the record. During the hearing, the plaintiff made clear that he is seeking the appointment of counsel, not the appointment of advisory counsel. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record:

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Appoint Counsel is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to attempt to find volunteer counsel to represent the plaintiff.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Subpoenas is DENIED as specified.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Ortiz

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 18, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-cv-00138-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 18, 2006)
Case details for

Martinez v. Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:SIREINO JOE MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. JOE ORTIZ, Executive Director…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Oct 18, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-cv-00138-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 18, 2006)