From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. McGraw

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 3, 2012
NO. 3-08-0738 (M.D. Tenn. May. 3, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 3-08-0738

05-03-2012

JAMES MARTINEZ v. SAMUEL TIMOTHY MCGRAW, et al.


JUDGE CAMPBELL


ORDER

Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 217) and Plaintiff's Objections thereto (Docket Nos. 229 and 230).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint (Docket No. 168) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

TODD J. CAMPBELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Martinez v. McGraw

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 3, 2012
NO. 3-08-0738 (M.D. Tenn. May. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Martinez v. McGraw

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MARTINEZ v. SAMUEL TIMOTHY MCGRAW, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: May 3, 2012

Citations

NO. 3-08-0738 (M.D. Tenn. May. 3, 2012)