From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Marine Transport Lines

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Mar 1, 1948
191 Misc. 652 (N.Y. App. Term 1948)

Opinion

March 1, 1948.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, WATSON, J.

Louis R. Harolds and William L. Standard for respondent appellant.

Matthew L. Danahar and Vernon S. Jones for appellant-respondent.



The defendant, general agent of the United States, was not liable to plaintiff either for unearned wages or maintenance and cure ( Shilman v. United States of America, 164 F.2d 649). Comity requires this court to follow the Circuit Court decision.

The judgment should be reversed, with $20 costs, and judgment directed for defendant, with costs.

HAMMER, EDER and HECHT, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Marine Transport Lines

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Mar 1, 1948
191 Misc. 652 (N.Y. App. Term 1948)
Case details for

Martinez v. Marine Transport Lines

Case Details

Full title:FRANCISCO MARTINEZ, Respondent-Appellant, v. MARINE TRANSPORT LINES, INC.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1948

Citations

191 Misc. 652 (N.Y. App. Term 1948)
78 N.Y.S.2d 3

Citing Cases

Warren v. United States

This right is inherent in the status of the seaman. It is by no means clear that a right to maintenance and…

Sanz v. Isbrandtsen Co.

In The Anna Howard Shaw ( 75 F. Supp. 210) Judge MEDINA held that the general agent is liable for maintenance…