From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Maher

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jun 5, 1980
631 F.2d 5 (2d Cir. 1980)

Opinion

No. 1239, Docket 80-7242.

Argued June 5, 1980.

Decided June 5, 1980.

Hugh Barber, Asst. Atty. Gen., Hartford, Conn. (Carl R. Ajello, Atty. Gen., and Francis J. MacGregor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Hartford, Conn., on the brief), for defendant-appellant.

Robert F. Echols, Derby, Conn. (Edward Mattison, New Haven, Conn., and Joanne Miner, Danielson, Conn., on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeal from the District of Connecticut.

Before KAUFMAN, Chief Judge, TIMBERS, Circuit Judge, and MISHLER, District Judge.

Hon. Jacob' Mishler, Senior Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.


On this appeal from a judgment entered in the District of Connecticut, T. F. Gilroy Daly, District Judge, requiring recalculation of benefits payable to "families of one" under the Aid To Families With Dependent Children program, 42 U.S.C. § 601, et seq. (1976), we affirm on the opinion of Judge Daly dated February 27, 1980. 485 F.Supp. 1264.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Maher

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jun 5, 1980
631 F.2d 5 (2d Cir. 1980)
Case details for

Martinez v. Maher

Case Details

Full title:JUDITH MARTINEZ ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. EDWARD MAHER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jun 5, 1980

Citations

631 F.2d 5 (2d Cir. 1980)

Citing Cases

Wheeler v. Cohen

See id. The prior statute, AFDC, did not allow states to take "into consideration in any way the presence of…

Ward v. Thomas

See Appellant's Brief at 39. Thus, an individual child like Fitzpatrick can constitute a "family of one"…