Martinez v. Horel

Full title: ERICK MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. HOREL, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: May 22, 2010

CV 07-2051-PA (PLA) (C.D. Cal. May. 22, 2010)

Opinion

ERICK MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. HOREL, Respondent. No. CV 07-2051-PA (PLA). United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. May 22, 2010.

          ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

          PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. The Court agrees with the recommendations of the magistrate judge.

         ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The report and recommendation is adopted.

2. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this order.

3. The clerk shall serve this order and the judgment on all counsel or parties of record.