From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Entrust Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 26, 2024
24-cv-01944-SVK (N.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-01944-SVK

07-26-2024

KRISTINA MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. ENTRUST CORPORATION, Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT RE: DKT. NO. 20

SUSAN VAN KEULEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff reports that this case has settled. All previously scheduled deadlines and appearances are vacated.

By September 3, 2024, the Parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal. If a stipulation of dismissal is not filed by the specified date, then the Parties shall appear on September 10, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. and show cause, if any, why the case should not be dismissed. Additionally, the Parties shall file a statement in response to this Order no later than September 3, 2024, describing with specificity (1) the Parties' efforts to finalize settlement within the time provided, and (2) whether additional time is necessary, the reasons therefor and the minimum amount of time required to finalize the settlement and file the stipulation of dismissal.

If a stipulation of dismissal is filed as ordered, the Order to Show Cause hearing will be automatically vacated and the Parties need not file a statement in response to this Order.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Entrust Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 26, 2024
24-cv-01944-SVK (N.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Martinez v. Entrust Corp.

Case Details

Full title:KRISTINA MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, v. ENTRUST CORPORATION, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 26, 2024

Citations

24-cv-01944-SVK (N.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2024)