From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Cross

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Feb 1, 2013
No. 13-cv-0015-DRH (S.D. Ill. Feb. 1, 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-cv-0015-DRH

02-01-2013

SALVADOR S. MARTINEZ, No. 14079-31 Petitioner, v. JAMES N. CROSS, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HERNDON, Chief Judge:

The petitioner, Salvador S. Martinez, is an inmate currently incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution in Greenville, Illinois. Petitioner is seeking a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 4) challenging the constitutionality of his confinement. Without commenting on the merits of the petitioner's claims, the Court concludes that the petition survives preliminary review under Rule 4 and Rule 1 (b) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in United States District Courts.

Rule 1 (b) of those Rules gives this Court the authority to apply the rules to other habeas corpus cases.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the respondent shall answer the petition or otherwise plead within thirty days of the date this order is entered. This preliminary order to respond does not, of course, preclude the government from making whatever waiver, exhaustion, or timeliness arguments it may wish to present. Service upon the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Illinois, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, Illinois, shall constitute sufficient service.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Local Rule 72.1(a)(2), this cause is referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for further pre-trial proceedings.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this entire matter be REFERRED to a United States Magistrate Judge for disposition, as contemplated by Local Rule 72.2(b)(2) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), should all the parties consent to such a referral.

Petitioner is ADVISED of his continuing obligation to keep the Clerk (and each opposing party) advised of his whereabouts during the pendency of this action. This notification shall be done in writing and not later than seven (7) days after a transfer or other change in address occurs. Failure to provide such notice may result in dismissal of this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

David R. Herndon

Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Martinez v. Cross

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Feb 1, 2013
No. 13-cv-0015-DRH (S.D. Ill. Feb. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Martinez v. Cross

Case Details

Full title:SALVADOR S. MARTINEZ, No. 14079-31 Petitioner, v. JAMES N. CROSS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Date published: Feb 1, 2013

Citations

No. 13-cv-0015-DRH (S.D. Ill. Feb. 1, 2013)