From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Columbia Sportswear USA Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 19, 2012
2:10-cv-1333-GEB-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2012)

Opinion

2:10-cv-1333-GEB-KJN

07-19-2012

Tony Martinez, Plaintiff, v. Columbia Sportswear USA Corp., dba Columbia Sportswear Company #446; Eddie Bauer, a Delaware LLC, dba Eddie Bauer Outlet #R-867; New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. dba New Balance #0015, Defendants.


ORDER DENYING REQUESTS TO TAX COSTS

Defendants Eddie Bauer and Columbia have requested that the Clerk tax costs against Plaintiff. (ECF Nos. 157, 158.) This request is denied since it was previously held that Defendants failed to show that Plaintiff's ADA claims were "frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation." See Order Denying Motions for Attorney Fees (ECF No. 171) (quoting Summers v. A. Teichert & Sons, Inc., 127 F.3d 1150, 1154 (9th Cir. 1997)); see also Brown v. Lucky Stores, 246 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2001) (finding that the test for awarding attorney fees to a defendant in an ADA action also applies to an award of costs).

____________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senier United States District Judge


Summaries of

Martinez v. Columbia Sportswear USA Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 19, 2012
2:10-cv-1333-GEB-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Martinez v. Columbia Sportswear USA Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Tony Martinez, Plaintiff, v. Columbia Sportswear USA Corp., dba Columbia…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 19, 2012

Citations

2:10-cv-1333-GEB-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2012)