From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. AT&T Mobility

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 6, 2011
CASE NO. CV 10-02085 DDP (AJWx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 10-02085 DDP (AJWx)

09-06-2011

MAURO MARTINEZ, an individual, Plaintiff, v. AT&T MOBILITY, a Limited Liability Company and DOES 1-50, Inclusive, Defendant.

JAMES S. MCNEILL (SBN 201663) LEAH C. ROMOND (SBN 266642) MCKENNA LONG & ALDRlDGE LLP Attorneys for Defendant AT&T MOBILITY LLC


JAMES S. MCNEILL (SBN 201663)

LEAH C. ROMOND (SBN 266642)

MCKENNA LONG & ALDRlDGE LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

AT&T MOBILITY LLC

FINAL JUDGMENT

Judge: Dean D. Pregerson

Magistrate Judge: Andrew J. Wistrich

Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC ("ATTM"), erroneously sued as AT&T Mobility, having served upon Plaintiff Mauro Martinez ("Plaintiff") an offer of judgment pursuant to Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (the "Offer"), and Plaintiff having accepted the Offer within fourteen days; and Plaintiff having filed with this Court the accepted Offer, together with proof of service; this Court orders as follows:

Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Mauro Martinez and against AT&T Mobility LLC ("ATTM") in the above-entitled action in the sum of $95,000, for any and all claims, causes of action and requests for relief that were asserted, or that could have been asserted, in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint ("Complaint") in the above-entitled action.

This judgment encompasses any and all claims, causes of action and requests for relief that were asserted, or that could have been asserted, in the Complaint and includes any and all compensatory damages, including loss of earnings, deferred compensation, bonuses, vacation and other employment penalties, damages for emotional distress, interest, penalties, attorneys' fees and costs. This judgment constitutes a full and final settlement, discharge release and waiver by Plaintiff Mauro Martinez of all claims asserted by Plaintiff against ATTM in the Complaint.

Nothing in this judgment shall be construed as an admission of liability for any of the claims asserted in the Complaint. To the contrary, ATTM expressly denies any such liability.

IT IS HERE SO ORDERED.

THE HON. DEAN D. PREGERSON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Martinez v. AT&T Mobility

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 6, 2011
CASE NO. CV 10-02085 DDP (AJWx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Martinez v. AT&T Mobility

Case Details

Full title:MAURO MARTINEZ, an individual, Plaintiff, v. AT&T MOBILITY, a Limited…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 6, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. CV 10-02085 DDP (AJWx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2011)