Opinion
No. 10-55005.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable lor decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed April 12, 2010.
Stephen Andrew Kennedy, Kennedy Clark Williams, PC, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Ryan N. Hawkins, Stephen S. Korniczky, Ericka Jacobs Schulz, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky Walker LLP, San Diego, CA, Mark Sableman, Thompson Coburn LLP, St. Louis, MO, Darl Ray Danford, Circuit, Mckellogg, Kinney Ross, La Jolla, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Michael M. Anello, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 3:09-cv-01601-MMA-POR.
Before: RYMER, McKEOWN and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate lor publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9ll — i Cir. R. 36-3.
Plaintiff-appellant Sherry Martin, dba Sherry Martin Photography appeals the district court's denial of her request for preliminary injunctive relief against defendants-appellees in connection with appellant's complaint against them for copyright infringement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.
We express no view on the merits of the complaint. Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. The Lands Council v. McNair, 537 F.3d 981, 986 (9th Cir. 2008); see Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 365, 374, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. a. United Press Intern., Inc., ( 586 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review). We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order denying the preliminary injunction.
We deny appellant's request for oral argument and her motion to strike portions of the answering brief.