From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Veronneau

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Waterbury
Feb 10, 1994
1994 Ct. Sup. 1438 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1994)

Opinion

No. 106771

February 10, 1994


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION


The defendant, Marcel Veronneau, has moved the court to order the plaintiffs to amend their complaint and cite in Moffo Trucking for apportionment under General Statutes 52-102 and 52-572h. Under the circumstances of this case, it is proper to deny the motion to cite in made pursuant to General Statutes 52-102. Bulley v. Tettlebaum, 8 CSCR 996 (October 11, 1993, Higgins, J.). If the defendant wishes to bring Moffo Trucking into the case, it may move to implead under General Statutes 52-102a and Practice Book 117. See Bulley, 8 CSCR at 996.

Accordingly, the motion to cite in is denied.

/s/ McDonald, J. McDONALD


Summaries of

Martin v. Veronneau

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Waterbury
Feb 10, 1994
1994 Ct. Sup. 1438 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1994)
Case details for

Martin v. Veronneau

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY ST. MARTIN v. MARCEL VERONNEAU, ET AL

Court:Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Waterbury

Date published: Feb 10, 1994

Citations

1994 Ct. Sup. 1438 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1994)