From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Van Hoomissen

Oregon Supreme Court
Dec 21, 1966
421 P.2d 369 (Or. 1966)

Opinion

Argued November 3, 1966

Dismissed December 21, 1966

IN BANC

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

ALFRED T. SULMONETTI, Judge.

CASE DISMISSED.

William C. Martin, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Dusenbery, Martin, Beatty, Parks Templeton, John C. Beatty, Jr., and Frederick T. Smith, Portland.

Willis A. West, Chief Civil Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE and HOLMAN, Justices.


This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court for Multnomah county which approved the ballot title for an initiative measure to repeal the Multnomah County Home Rule Charter. This is the same initiative measure involved in our decision in Stuart v. Weldon, decided December 14, 1966, Or., 421 P.2d 367. That decision makes this case moot and the case is, therefore, dismissed.


This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court for Multnomah county which approved the ballot title for an initiative measure to repeal the Multnomah County Home Rule Charter. This is the same initiative measure involved in our decision in Stuart v. Weldon, 245 Or. 203, 421 P.2d 367 (1966). That decision makes this case moot and the case is, therefore, dismissed.


Summaries of

Martin v. Van Hoomissen

Oregon Supreme Court
Dec 21, 1966
421 P.2d 369 (Or. 1966)
Case details for

Martin v. Van Hoomissen

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN v. VAN HOOMISSEN ET AL

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Dec 21, 1966

Citations

421 P.2d 369 (Or. 1966)
421 P.2d 369