Opinion
September, 1909.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kellogg and Cochrane, JJ., dissenting.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Martin v. Sweet Doyle Valve Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1909
134 App. Div. 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)
Summaries of
Martin v. Sweet Doyle Valve Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1909
134 App. Div. 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)
Case details for
Martin v. Sweet Doyle Valve Company
Case Details
Full title:William E. Martin, Respondent, v. Sweet Doyle Valve Company, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: Sep 1, 1909
Citations
134 App. Div. 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)
Citing Cases
St. Paul, Minn. Man. Ry. Co. v. Donohue
effected solely by improvements upon the land is confined to land within the particular quarter-section on…