From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 28, 2001
800 So. 2d 363 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 4D01-3514.

November 28, 2001.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Richard L. Oftedal, J.

Anthony R. Martin, Palm Beach, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


The order denying Martin's motion to correct illegal sentence is reversed. The trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on the motion, which was filed after appellate jurisdiction had vested in this court.Martin v. State, 2001 WL 1230852 (Fla. 4th DCA Oct. 17, 2001).

The trial court is directed to dismiss the motion, without prejudice to Martin to refile now that the mandate has issued in the direct appeal and jurisdiction has been returned to the circuit court. Campbell-Eley v. State, 763 So.2d 539 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

STONE, FARMER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Martin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 28, 2001
800 So. 2d 363 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Martin v. State

Case Details

Full title:Anthony R. MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 28, 2001

Citations

800 So. 2d 363 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Martinez v. State

As a result of this timing, the postconviction court was without jurisdiction to enter the order on the rule…

Rydberg v. State

For several reasons, the pro se motion did not preserve the sentencing issues argued on appeal. First, the…